Is HFNC noninferior to NIV for Acute Respiratory Failure?

Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine

תוכן מסופק על ידי Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי Critical Care Perspectives in Emergency Medicine או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

10M ago 31:44

MP3•בית הפרקים

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on October 27, 2025 14:55 (14d ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Both NIV and HFNC are used to treat patients with acute respiratory failure. Current guidelines recommend NIV for acute respiratory failure caused by COPD and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. However, NIV may be hard for some patients to tolerate. When compared to low-flow oxygen therapy, HFNC has been shown to improve oxygenation, improve alveolar recruitment, and enhance clearance of secretions. HFNC may be easier to use and tolerate than NIV, but there remains uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of HFNC compared to NIV for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In this podcast, we discuss the RENOVATE trial that sought to compare HFNC with NIV on rates of intubation in patients with acute respiratory failure.

103 פרקים

#Medicine #Fitness #Podcasting Education #Critical Care Perspectives In Emergency Medicine #On Covid19