This is what the news should sound like. The biggest stories of our time, told by the best journalists in the world. Hosted by Michael Barbaro and Sabrina Tavernise. Twenty minutes a day, five days a week, ready by 6 a.m. Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Listen to this podcast in New York Times Audio, our new iOS app for news subscribers. Download now at ...
…
continue reading
Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
Checked 1M ago
הוסף לפני seven שנים
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - אפליקציית פודקאסט
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !
פודקאסטים ששווה להאזין
בחסות
<
<div class="span index">1</div> <span><a class="" data-remote="true" data-type="html" href="/series/the-vanished">The Vanished</a></span>


Join us on a journey into the perplexing world of disappearances, where individuals vanish without a trace, leaving behind a void filled with questions and speculation.
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments
סמן הכל כלא נצפה...
Manage series 1641308
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
71 פרקים
סמן הכל כלא נצפה...
Manage series 1641308
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
71 פרקים
כל הפרקים
×U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that President Donald Trump’s Proclamation restricting travel and immigration to the US from certain countries (“travel ban”) does not violate the president’s statutory authority or the Establishment Clause of the Constitution. The Court was also asked, but did not decide, whether a global injunction barring enforcement of parts of the Proclamation is impermissibly overbroad.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court decided that the district court erred in disregarding the presumption of good faith on the part of the Texas Legislature and improperly reversed the burden of proof in requiring the state to show a lack of discriminatory intent in adopting new districting plans; the Court also held that one of the state house districts at issue was an impermissible racial gerrymander.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. 1:00:32
1:00:32
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:00:32
A case in which the Court decided that a federal court determining foreign law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 should accord respectful consideration to a foreign government’s submission, but the court is not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government’s statements.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that because the record in this case as a whole demonstrated that the judge had a reasoned basis for his decision, the judge’s explanation for reducing Adaucto Chavez-Meza’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to the middle instead of the bottom of the amended Federal Guidelines range was adequate.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that a notice to appear for a removal hearing that does not specify the place and time of the hearing does not trigger the stop-time rule of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1), which gives the attorney general discretion to cancel removal for an alien who, among other criteria, has been continuously physically present in the country for at least ten years.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission 1:00:00
1:00:00
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:00:00
A case in which the Court decided that administrative law judges of the Securities and Exchange Commission are "officers of the United States" subject to the Constitution's Appointments Clause.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 Washington v. United States 1:01:32
1:01:32
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:01:32
A case in which the Court was asked to decide, among other things, whether the state of Washington’s use of culverts to divert water violates its treaties with Indian tribes, and if so, whether the state must replace those culverts, at great cost.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court held that under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(b)(4), which pertains to reimbursement by defendants to victims for expenses incurred during the investigation or prosecution related to the offense, the words “investigation” and “proceedings” encompass only government investigations and criminal proceedings and do not include private investigations and civil or bankruptcy proceedings.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. 1:00:10
1:00:10
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:00:10
A case in which the Court overruled Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois, holding that states may require sellers with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales tax for goods sold within the state.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. Appling 57:27
57:27
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי57:27
A case in which the Court decided that a statement regarding a specific asset can be a “statement respecting the debtor’s . . . financial condition” under section 523(a)(2)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States 49:17
49:17
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי49:17
A case in which the Court decided that employee stock options are not taxable “compensation” under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act because they are not “money remuneration.”
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

1 WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. 1:01:23
1:01:23
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:01:23
A case in which the Court held that WesternGeco’s award for lost profits was a permissible domestic application of § 284 of the Patent Act.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court upheld the federal district court's denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction by several Republican voters who alleged partisan gerrymandering in Maryland.
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court decided that the petitioners, who were criminal defendants, were not eligible for sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because their sentences were not “based on” their lowered Federal Sentencing Guidelines ranges, but rather were “based on” the mandatory minimum sentences for their offenses and their substantial assistance to the government.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court 2017 Term Arguments

A case in which the Court decided that a sentence imposed pursuant to a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) (“Type C”) plea bargain is “based on” the defendant’s Federal Sentencing Guidelines range as long as that range was a component of the framework the court used in imposing the sentence or accepting the plea bargain, meaning that in this case, Erik Hughes could seek a sentencing reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).…
ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!
Player FM סורק את האינטרנט עבור פודקאסטים באיכות גבוהה בשבילכם כדי שתהנו מהם כרגע. זה יישום הפודקאסט הטוב ביותר והוא עובד על אנדרואיד, iPhone ואינטרנט. הירשמו לסנכרון מנויים במכשירים שונים.