Lisa Testart ציבורי
[search 0]
Download the App!
show episodes
 
If you’ve ever thought “how the fuck did that happen” as you walked out of the Australian Family Law system and losing everything, while watching your psychopathic ex get away with the boys club trifecta of perjury, contempt, and not coughing up their financials til you’re broke, homeless, and probably couch surfing, then boy have you come to the right place! Strap on your fuck it attitude, and settle in to find out what your lawyer never told you…be prepared to feel very ducking angry 😡 and ...
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
Send us a text Use the new 'send us a text' feature at the top of every episode description to send me your ideas, suggestions for topics, and general feedback about what you'd like to hear more of. I have plenty of ideas, but I'd love to hear what you think. Family law is an isolating, traumatising, soul destroying place to be, and I hope my small…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Just like the Eagles sing in Hotel California: if you’re in a property case “You can check-out any time you like, but you can never leave!" Without leave of the court, you cannot withdraw from a property case once it’s started, no matter how exhaustipated or traumatised you are by your psychonarc ex. Withdrawing leaves you vulnerable…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text The Harman Undertaking, also known as the Harman Obligation, is not found in legislation, but in the UK case of Harman v Secretary of State for Home Department [1983]. It is an implied obligation not to use documents obtained or produced as a result of the compulsory processes of the court for any collateral or ulterior purpose. The …
  continue reading
 
Send us a text In the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia trial is by affidavit, and your affidavit becomes your evidence in chief. At trial you will be cross-examined about your evidence in chief and all parts of your affidavit will be canvassed. Your affidavit is how you present the facts of your case. Affidavits should be concise, fact…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Just like with recycling, family law has rules that govern how a case is run, and there are lots of practice notes and guides available to assist you in running a case. Wishlitigators want the process to fit their belief systems about how family law should be run, instead of fitting themselves into the rules and processes of the fami…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text We don't have a constitution that affords us rights enshrined like the US does, so instead we rely on Section 128 of the Evidence Act 1995 to protect witnesses under oath from giving evidence that could lead to self-inrimination. We're a kind mob like that...we let you have just enough rope until we figure out if it's enough to hang …
  continue reading
 
Send us a text FAMILY LAW RULES 2004 - RULE 13.04 Full and frank disclosure (1) A party to a financial case must make full and frank disclosure of the party's financial circumstances, including: (a) the party's earnings, including income that is paid or assigned to another party, person or legal entity; (b) any vested or contingent interest in prop…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text The dreadful depersonalisation of never having your name used unless you’re in trouble; serious trouble. This is not an easy episode to listen to, and it’s achingly heartbreaking 💔 ❤️‍🩹 My hard-won knowledge has come at huge expense, and there’s no running from that. If you are triggered by this episode, please look after yourself. R…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text This episode deals with sexual abuse, trauma and comes with a trigger warning. This is not an easy episode to listen to, and it’s achingly heartbreaking 💔 ❤️‍🩹 My hard-won knowledge has come at huge expense, and there’s no running from that. If you are triggered by this episode, please look after yourself. Reach out to support people…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Rice and Asplund particularly applies in final parenting orders, which the court recognises are never really final. Rice and Asplund is the case that set the framework for what the court should consider when assessing an application to reopen final orders. Follow the link 👇👇👇 TIME FOR A CHANGE? SHARED PARENTING, VARIATION OF ORDERS A…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Section 121 of the Family Law Act is one of the most controversial aspects of this jurisdiction. It’s not well understood, and in this episode we try to clarify what it’s purpose is, how long it applies, and why it’s an important protective measure for children and victims. Follow the link 👇👇👇 FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 121 Restricti…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text When there’s an error in your orders, what do you do? Can it be fixed? Yes it can! Follow the link 👇👇👇 FAMILY LAW RULES 2004 - RULE 17.02 Varying or setting aside orders (1) The court may at any time vary or set aside an order , if: (a) it was made in the absence of a party; or (b) it was obtained by fraud; or (c) it is interlocutory…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text It can be pretty confusing trying to figure out why some are barristers, and others are solicitors. It’s like being GP and being called Dr, or a surgeon and being a Mister. Here we try to unpack it so you can get some understanding of what’s what and who’s who in the legal zoo. Support the show…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Ever wondered why so many victims and family law parties get less than the outcome they were told they’d get? It’s because family lawyers don’t do strategy. If they played mini golf a tad more they’d understand the analogy. Once you get it, you’ll never forget it. Support the showעל ידי Lisa Testart
  continue reading
 
Send us a text What’s a Kennon case and why should it matter? A review of Kennon v Kennon BENSON & DRURY [2020] FamCAFC 303 FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – PROPERTY – Kennon argument – Where the primary judge assessed an adjustment of 5% – Whether the primary judge erred in the way her Honour took into account contributions made by the respondent that had be…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 70NAC Meaning of contravened an order A person is taken for the purposes of this Division to have contravened an order under this Act affecting children if, and only if: (a) where the person is bound by the order--he or she has: (i) intentionally failed to comply with the order; or (ii) made no reasonable a…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Contempt is criminal, while a contravention is civil. The differences are not that subtle, but I’ve had Australian lawyers argue with me that I’m wrong. Makes for a fun day in my life when lawyers act like this, but it’s what happens when you challenge the rarified air of the the legal profession. FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 112AP Con…
  continue reading
 
Send us a text Welcome to the first episode of surviving a psychopath in The Australian legal system. Lisa introduces herself and her unique style of saying it how it is, so you can get the best out of your case. This crazy cat lady doesn't pull any punches and leaves no stone unturned in her dream of assisting you in your case. Support the show…
  continue reading
 
Loading …

מדריך עזר מהיר