Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to April/May.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
In under 30 minutes. Do you want to understand specific cases? We are here to provide commentary on every Supreme Court case.
…
continue reading
Unedited English audio of oral arguments at the Supreme Court of Canada. Created as a public service to promote public access and awareness of the workings of Canada’s highest court. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Court. Original archived webcasts can be found on the Court’s website at scc-csc.ca. Feedback welcome: podcast at scchearings dot ca.
…
continue reading
Brett and Nazim are two attorneys who hate being attorneys. Each week, they discuss current Supreme Court cases with the intent to make the law more accessible to the average person, while ruminating on what makes the law both frustrating and interesting. This podcast is not legal advice and is for entertainment purposes only. If anything you hear leads you to believe you need legal advice, please contact an attorney immediately
…
continue reading
The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court. (Updated periodically) PBS News is supported by - https://www.pbs.org/newshour/about/funders
…
continue reading
A chronological podcast of oral arguments with improved files and meta data. Hosted by Free Law Project through the CourtListener.com initiative. Not an official podcast.
…
continue reading
Audio from oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States (beg. Oct. 2010)
…
continue reading
In depth explanations of Supreme Court Cases New Jersey v T.L.O, Mapp v Ohio, and Miranda v Arizona.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
Oral arguments before the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
A podcast feed for the audio of Supreme Court oral arguments and decision announcements. Short case descriptions are reproduced from Oyez.org under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This feed is not approved, managed, or affiliated with Oyez.org. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
…
continue reading
We will dive into the astounding stories of the Supreme Court.
…
continue reading
Opinion announcements from the Supreme Court of the United States, presented by Oyez, a multimedia judicial archive at the IllinoisTech Chicago-Kent College of Law.
…
continue reading
The Queens Supreme Court podcast is the hilarious spinoff of the hit online series “The Queens Supreme Court” with Ts Madison. The premise of the weekly satirical show is to discuss pop culture and all the hot social media trends, topics and gossip THEN try them as cases, render judgements and sentence the crimes accordingly to determine the ultimate fate of each celebrity!
…
continue reading
Podcast by Hemant Mehta
…
continue reading
The Supreme Court decision syllabus, read without personal commentary. See: Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and Grigg, 33 U.S. 591 (1834) and United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. Photo by: Davi Kelly. Founded by RJ Dieken. Now hosted by Jake Leahy. Frequent guest host Jeff Barnum. *Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.
…
continue reading
Any listeners out there...really want entertaining basketball content? Don't want to worry about the hosts - all on the show trying to force "controversial" hot takes, all in your earbuds, yelling back and forth to win an argument? Come to The Supreme Court: A Basketball Podcast! Check back with the SC trio; Robaire, Chris, and Henri, Wednesdays as we discuss the latest NBA headlines, news, and transactions.
…
continue reading
Throughout the years the Supreme Court has evolved much like the rest of the federal government. This would not be without landmark rulings, which will be the main focus of this podcast. Landmark rulings lay the groundwork for laws to be overturned or upheld and allow for the United States to work toward major goals. Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/aaron-larson2/support
…
continue reading
This study, A Christian Response to the Supreme Court Decision, exposes the foreboding Danger that this ruling will bring upon our nation if things don’t turn around very quickly. You will also be thoroughly equipped to give a loving Biblical apologetic response to 15 different accusations made against Christians regarding this issue.
…
continue reading
1
23-970 NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB [11/13/24]
14:58
14:58
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
14:58
The case NVIDIA v. Öhman, concerning the sufficiency of pleadings under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). The core dispute centers on the level of detail required in complaints alleging corporate fraud, specifically regarding the use of expert reports and the necessity of disclosing the contents of internal documents. The justic…
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB, No. 23-970 [Arg: 11.13.2024]
1:27:13
1:27:13
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:27:13
QUESTION PRESENTED: (1) Whether plaintiffs seeking to allege scienter under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act based on allegations about internal company documents must plead with particularity the contents of those documents; and (2) whether plaintiffs can satisfy the Act's falsity requirement by relying on an expert opinion to substitu…
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
1:27:13
1:27:13
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:27:13
A case in which the Court will clarify the pleading standards to show knowledge or intent for Private Securities Litigation Reform Act claims that rely on internal company documents.
…
continue reading
1
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB
1:14:54
1:14:54
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:14:54
NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder ABעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Thomas Stevenson v. His Majesty the King (41269)
1:10:49
1:10:49
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:10:49
Two people robbed a restaurant with their faces completely covered. The incident was captured on security cameras. The crime remained unsolved for several years until an unsavoury third-party witness implicated the appellant as one of the robbers. The appellant was charged with robbery and disguise with intent to commit an indictable offence under …
…
continue reading
1
The 2024 Presidential Election
1:06:25
1:06:25
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:06:25
So you've won/lost the 2024 Presidential election, what comes next? Brett and Nazim take some time to vet out what the 2024 election means for the President, the Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies. Sprinkle in a touch of doom, and just a hint of gloom, and you've got a winning podcast episode. Law starts from the beginning, with a healthy ta…
…
continue reading
1
How Virginia's voter roll purge could impact the election
5:12
5:12
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
5:12
Just days before the election, the Supreme Court ruled Virginia will be able to continue to purge people from the state's voter rolls. The state has argued it is part of an effort to remove noncitizens from the rolls, but voting rights advocates have found several U.S. citizens were also removed from the rolls at the same time. Amna Nawaz discussed…
…
continue reading
1
23-825 Delligatti v. United States [11/12/24]
10:26
10:26
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
10:26
The case Salvatore Delligatti v. United States. The case centers on the interpretation of the "Elements Clause" within the Armed Career Criminal Act, specifically whether the clause applies to crimes of omission (failing to act) as well as acts of commission. The petitioner argues that the clause only covers affirmative actions involving violent ph…
…
continue reading
1
23-929 Velazquez v. Garland, Att'y Gen. [11/12/24]
12:22
12:22
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
12:22
The Supreme Court case Velazquez v. Garland. The central issue is the interpretation of a 60-day deadline for voluntary departure in immigration law, specifically whether this deadline should be extended if it falls on a weekend or holiday. The petitioner argues for an extension based on established legal principles and regulations, while the respo…
…
continue reading
1
23-980 Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank [11/06/24]
10:25
10:25
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
10:25
The case Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank. The case centers on whether risk disclosures in financial statements are misleading by omission if they don't mention past occurrences of the described risk. The petitioners argue that such omissions are only misleading if they create an implied representation about the past, while the respondents contend that…
…
continue reading
1
23-217 E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera [11/05/24]
9:36
9:36
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
9:36
The case E.M.D. Sales, Inc., et al. v. Faustino Sanchez Carrera, et al. The central issue concerns the appropriate standard of proof—preponderance of the evidence versus clear and convincing evidence—for determining whether employees fall under an exemption from the Fair Labor Standards Act's overtime requirements. The Petitioners argue for the def…
…
continue reading
1
23-715 Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HS [11/05/24]
12:19
12:19
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
12:19
The case Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra. The case concerns the interpretation of the phrase "entitled to benefits" within the Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) adjustment formula, specifically regarding Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. The petitioners argue that "entitled to benefits" should refer to program eligibility, …
…
continue reading
1
23-1127 Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S. [11/04/24]
13:48
13:48
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
13:48
This Supreme Court oral argument concerns the application of the False Claims Act (FCA) to the E-rate program, which funds telecommunications services for schools and libraries. The petitioner argues the FCA doesn't apply because the government doesn't directly provide the funds, instead using a private administrator and requiring private carriers …
…
continue reading
1
23-753 San Francisco v. EPA [10/16/24]
16:22
16:22
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
16:22
The case of San Francisco v. EPA. The case centers on the EPA's use of "generic prohibitions" in discharge permits, which San Francisco argues are vague and fail to provide adequate notice of discharge limitations. The dispute hinges on the interpretation of Section 301(b)(1)(C) of the Clean Water Act, focusing on whether it allows limitations beyo…
…
continue reading
1
23-713 Bufkin v. McDonough, Sec. of VA [10/16/24]
28:52
28:52
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
28:52
The case Bufkin v. McDonough. The central issue concerns the standard of review for the Veterans Court's assessment of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of the "benefit-of-the-doubt" rule. Petitioners argue for a less deferential review, emphasizing the statute's intent to ensure meaningful scrutiny of the agency's decisions. The resp…
…
continue reading
1
23-583 Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, Sec. of Homeland Security [10/15/24]
22:14
22:14
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
22:14
The case Bouarfa v. Mayorkas. The central issue is whether the revocation of an immigration petition, following a determination of sham marriage, is subject to judicial review. The petitioner argues that the revocation is mandatory and thus reviewable, citing statutory language and the government’s consistent practice. The respondent, the governmen…
…
continue reading
1
23-365 Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn [10/15/24]
14:43
14:43
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
14:43
The case of Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. Horn. The central question is whether economic losses stemming from personal injuries are recoverable under RICO. The petitioner argues that RICO excludes such claims, emphasizing the distinction between "injury" (invasion of a legal right) and "damages" (monetary losses resulting from injury). The respondent …
…
continue reading
1
22-7466 Glossip v. Oklahoma [10/09/24]
21:24
21:24
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
21:24
The case of Glossip v. State of Oklahoma, focusing on whether the state court's denial of the petitioner's request to waive procedural bars to his habeas corpus claim constitutes an adequate and independent state ground for review. The central issue revolves around alleged Brady and Napue violations, specifically the prosecution's suppression of ev…
…
continue reading
1
23-621 Lackey v. Stinnie [10/08/24]
14:55
14:55
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
14:55
The case of Lackey v. Stinnie, heard on October 8, 2024. The central question concerns whether a preliminary injunction constitutes a "prevailing party" status under Section 1988, allowing for attorney's fee awards. The petitioner argues that a preliminary injunction, being a temporary measure not deciding the case's merits, does not qualify. The r…
…
continue reading
1
23-852 Garland, Att'y Gen. v. VanDerStok [10/08/24]
18:45
18:45
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
18:45
The case Garland v. VanDerStok, concerning the legality of a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) rule regulating firearm parts kits and partially complete receivers. The Solicitor General argued the rule is consistent with existing law and addresses a serious public safety issue, while the respondents contended the ATF exceede…
…
continue reading
1
23-677 Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger [10/07/24]
26:20
26:20
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
26:20
The case Royal Canin v. Wullschleger. The core issue revolves around whether a federal court retains supplemental jurisdiction after a plaintiff amends their complaint to remove all federal claims, particularly in cases initially brought in state court and then removed. Petitioners argue established precedent and Section 1367 support retaining juri…
…
continue reading
1
23-191 Williams v. Washington [10/07/24]
16:57
16:57
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
16:57
The case Williams v. Fitzgerald. The central issue is whether an Alabama state law requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies before bringing a §1983 due process claim is preempted by federal law. The petitioner argues that the state's exhaustion requirement creates an insurmountable barrier to accessing federal courts, effectively granting th…
…
continue reading
1
Delligatti v. U.S., No. 23-825 [Arg: 11.12.2024]
1:03:13
1:03:13
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:03:13
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★על ידי Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Velazquez v. Garland, No. 23-929 [Arg: 11.12.2024]
1:07:14
1:07:14
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:07:14
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1). ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★על ידי Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 23-980 [Arg: 11.6.2024]
1:43:36
1:43:36
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:43:36
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★על ידי Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
E.M.D. Sales v. Carrera, No. 23-217 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
42:10
42:10
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
42:10
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★על ידי Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra, No. 23-715 [Arg: 11.5.2024]
1:10:28
1:10:28
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:10:28
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the phrase “entitled ... to benefits,” used twice in the same sentence of the Medicare Act, means the same thing for Medicare part A and Supplemental Social Security benefits, such that it includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received. ★ Support this podcast on Pa…
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath, No. 23-1127 [Arg: 11.4.2024]
1:33:56
1:33:56
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:33:56
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act. ★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★על ידי Austin Songer
…
continue reading
1
Delligatti v. United States
1:03:12
1:03:12
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:03:12
A case in which the Court will decide whether a crime that requires proof of bodily injury or death, but can be committed by failing to take action, has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether, when a noncitizen's voluntary-departure period ends on a weekend or public holiday, a motion to reopen filed the next business day is sufficient to avoid the penalties for failure to depart under 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(d)(1).
…
continue reading
Delligatti v. United Statesעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Velazquez v. Garland, Att'y Gen.
57:44
57:44
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
57:44
Velazquez v. Garland, Att'y Gen.על ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Duncan Sinclair, et al. v. Venezia Turismo, Venice Limousine S.R.L, Narduzzi E Solemar S.L.R. (40696)
1:58:46
1:58:46
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:58:46
The appellants, Duncan and Michelle Sinclair, and their son were on a European holiday and were injured in an accident in Venice, Italy. They were passengers on a water taxi that crashed into a wooden structure. The appellants were both injured. The appellants had arranged their travels through Amex Canada Inc., operating under the name Centurion T…
…
continue reading
1
Government of Saskatchewan – Minister of Environment v. Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, et al. (40740)
2:21:20
2:21:20
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:21:20
The respondents, Métis Nation – Saskatchewan, and Métis Nation – Saskatchewan Secretariate Inc. (collectively, “the Métis respondents” or “MNS”), have long claimed Aboriginal title and rights (including commercial rights) to large areas of the Province of Saskatchewan. The appellant, Government of Saskatchewan, has consistently opposed the existenc…
…
continue reading
1
Izabela Piekut v. His Majesty the King in Right of Canada as Represented by the Minister of National Revenue (40782)
2:33:22
2:33:22
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
2:33:22
Between September 1987 and October 1994, the appellant, Izabela Piekut, obtained a series of student loans through a federal government program. She graduated in 1994 and obtained her teaching diploma the following year. The appellant received two further student loans in 2002 and 2003, when she earned a master’s degree. In 2008, the appellant enro…
…
continue reading
1
Facebook v. Amalgamated Bank
1:43:35
1:43:35
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:43:35
A case in which the Court will decide whether risk disclosures are false or misleading when they do not disclose that a risk has materialized in the past, even if that past event presents no known risk of ongoing or future business harm.
…
continue reading
1
Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bank
1:28:57
1:28:57
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:28:57
Facebook, Inc. v. Amalgamated Bankעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Becerra
1:10:28
1:10:28
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:10:28
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “entitled… to benefits” includes all who meet basic program eligibility criteria, whether or not benefits are actually received.
…
continue reading
A case in which the Court will decide whether the burden of proof that employers must satisfy to demonstrate the applicability of a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption is a mere preponderance of the evidence or clear and convincing evidence.
…
continue reading
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carreraעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HS
1:00:31
1:00:31
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:00:31
Advocate Christ Medical v. Becerra, Sec. of H&HSעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
I.M. v. His Majesty the King (40868)
3:13:25
3:13:25
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
3:13:25
(PUBLICATION BAN IN CASE) (CERTAIN INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC) The appellant participated in a planned robbery with intent to steal a firearm from a seventeen year old youth. He and his co-assailants attacked the victim outside his residence. They beat him and stabbed him. Their victim died from his wounds. The appellant and his co-ass…
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. cv. United States, ex rel. Heath
1:33:56
1:33:56
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:33:56
A case in which the Court will decide whether reimbursement requests submitted to the Federal Communications Commission's E-rate program are “claims” under the False Claims Act.
…
continue reading
1
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Heath
1:20:40
1:20:40
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:20:40
Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Heathעל ידי Supreme Court of the United States
…
continue reading
1
How the racial makeup of colleges changed after the affirmative action ruling
4:29
4:29
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
4:29
Universities are disclosing the racial makeup of the first class of students admitted after the Supreme Court overturned affirmative action. The numbers give a detailed look at the impact of the ruling. While there's variation, analyses show Black enrollment is down at several colleges. Geoff Bennett discussed more with David Leonhardt of The New Y…
…
continue reading
1
Bufkin v. McDonough, No. 23-713 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:12:45
1:12:45
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:12:45
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy 38 U.S.C. § 7261(b)(1), which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule. ★ Su…
…
continue reading
1
City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 23-753 [Arg: 10.16.2024]
1:37:34
1:37:34
נגן מאוחר יותר
נגן מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי
1:37:34
QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the Clean Water Act allows the Environmental Protection Agency (or an authorized state) to impose generic prohibitions in National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits that subject permit-holders to enforcement for violating water quality standards without identifying specific limits to which their discharges m…
…
continue reading