ConstructorCast - Behind the Bench: AGC's Litigation Strategy

ConstructorCast

In this episode, we delve into the intricacies of the Associated General Contractors of America's (AGC) litigation program, which serves as a crucial component of its broader advocacy efforts. We explore how AGC strategically engages in judicial matters to safeguard and improve the business environment for construction contractors, aligning with its overarching goal of advancing industry interests and protecting against disruption. AGC’s legal staff discuss the decision-making process behind legal action, the importance of partnerships, updates on current judicial actions, and the vital role of funding through the Construction Advocacy Fund (CAF). Additionally, we outline guidelines for AGC chapters and members to request support for impactful cases, emphasizing the significance of national impact and broader industry implications in AGC's decision-making. Guests: Stephen Sandherr CEO – AGC of America Jimmy Christianson Vice President, Government Relations – AGC of America Leah Pilconis General Counsel and ConstructorCast Host – AGC of America For details on current issues visit https://advocacy.agc.org The Construction Advocacy Fund: The Fund helps finance a host of critical campaigns, including AGC’s ongoing efforts to fight for federal infrastructure investments, push back against costly and needless regulatory burdens, promote workforce development and workplace safety, and enhance construction technology. Visit https://constructionadvocacyfund.agc.org to learn more. Timestamped Topics: • 00:00 - Introduction • 01:35 - Overview of AGC's litigation program and its alignment with advocacy goals • 05:37 - Goals and strategies for challenging government regulations • 8:08 - Decision-making process for legal action • 10:25 - Partnerships and collaborations within the industry • 11:58 - Updates on current judicial actions and recent US Supreme Court victories • 36:27 - AGC’s litigation program funding • 39:53 - Guidelines for AGC chapters and members to request support for impactful cases • 41:22 - Conclusion