Artwork

תוכן מסופק על ידי In-depth Creative. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי In-depth Creative או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - אפליקציית פודקאסט
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !

ASEAN Through the Lens of a Human Rights Activist Working Inside ASEAN

26:53
 
שתפו
 

Manage episode 263764763 series 2698143
תוכן מסופק על ידי In-depth Creative. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי In-depth Creative או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

Although ASEAN has been under fire for its powerlessness in the face of several human rights atrocities such as attacks on Rohingya ethnic minority in Myanmar, internal ASEAN officials, some of whom have lengthy human rights activism experience, remain optimistic that the association can be a force for good. What do they actually see in ASEAN’s non-interference and consensus principles? Why do they keep on appeasing the Myanmar Government while violence raged in Myanmar’s Rakhine State? Why do member states tend to be more closed off in ASEAN forums than in the UN forum? And more questions. Join us for a discussion with the Indonesian Representative of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission of Human Rights (AICHR), Yuyun Wahyuningrum.
|| 0.0 – 1.31:Current criticism towards ASEAN. Questions of the Episode | 1.35 – 3.37:
Limits and Challenges of AICHR in Responding to Human Rights Issues in ASEAN.
Countries without human rights commission body | 3.49 – 9.27: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 1). Background of the establishment of ASEAN that shapes current principles. How far should we make compromises? | 9.29 – 12.09: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 2). Lessons learned from the late Surim Pitsuwan: Practice first, Institutionalise later. How seemingly trivial effort is actually a huge progress in ASEAN. | 12.11 – 13.49: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 3). Development of the “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in practice.| 13.50 – 16.52: The need for AICHR to evolve. How AICHR respond to sanitised human rights reports by ASEAN member states? Practice first, institutionalise later. | 17.19 – 21.24: Difference reporting attitude and openness in Geneva and in ASEAN. Plan to Implement Advisory Notes and other changes in AICHR. | 21.37 – 24.39: Why are some countries more open in UN forums compared to that in ASEAN? | 24.40 – 25.52: Funding of ASEAN. | 25.52 – 26.53: Closing.||

  continue reading

65 פרקים

Artwork
iconשתפו
 
Manage episode 263764763 series 2698143
תוכן מסופק על ידי In-depth Creative. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי In-depth Creative או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

Although ASEAN has been under fire for its powerlessness in the face of several human rights atrocities such as attacks on Rohingya ethnic minority in Myanmar, internal ASEAN officials, some of whom have lengthy human rights activism experience, remain optimistic that the association can be a force for good. What do they actually see in ASEAN’s non-interference and consensus principles? Why do they keep on appeasing the Myanmar Government while violence raged in Myanmar’s Rakhine State? Why do member states tend to be more closed off in ASEAN forums than in the UN forum? And more questions. Join us for a discussion with the Indonesian Representative of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission of Human Rights (AICHR), Yuyun Wahyuningrum.
|| 0.0 – 1.31:Current criticism towards ASEAN. Questions of the Episode | 1.35 – 3.37:
Limits and Challenges of AICHR in Responding to Human Rights Issues in ASEAN.
Countries without human rights commission body | 3.49 – 9.27: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 1). Background of the establishment of ASEAN that shapes current principles. How far should we make compromises? | 9.29 – 12.09: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 2). Lessons learned from the late Surim Pitsuwan: Practice first, Institutionalise later. How seemingly trivial effort is actually a huge progress in ASEAN. | 12.11 – 13.49: Response to critiques of “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in ASEAN (Part 3). Development of the “Non-Interference” and “Consensus” principles in practice.| 13.50 – 16.52: The need for AICHR to evolve. How AICHR respond to sanitised human rights reports by ASEAN member states? Practice first, institutionalise later. | 17.19 – 21.24: Difference reporting attitude and openness in Geneva and in ASEAN. Plan to Implement Advisory Notes and other changes in AICHR. | 21.37 – 24.39: Why are some countries more open in UN forums compared to that in ASEAN? | 24.40 – 25.52: Funding of ASEAN. | 25.52 – 26.53: Closing.||

  continue reading

65 פרקים

Все серии

×
 
Loading …

ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!

Player FM סורק את האינטרנט עבור פודקאסטים באיכות גבוהה בשבילכם כדי שתהנו מהם כרגע. זה יישום הפודקאסט הטוב ביותר והוא עובד על אנדרואיד, iPhone ואינטרנט. הירשמו לסנכרון מנויים במכשירים שונים.

 

מדריך עזר מהיר