MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right

44 subscribers

Law Roundup

הוסף לפני eight שנים

תוכן מסופק על ידי Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006, Lisa Parmley, and USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

The Action Catalyst

1
Beyond Basketball: Championship Lessons for Success, with Tyler Summitt (Leadership, Sports, Personal Development, Business) 28:47

לפני 16 ימים28:47

הפעל מאוחר יותר

רשימות

לייק

אהבתי

28:47

Tyler Summitt, son of legendary coach Pat Summitt, as well as the Co-Founder of Pat Summitt Leadership Group , shares the group’s mission, the story of Pat’s humble beginnings, the art of mastering full executive decision making in 90 second or less, the "secret sauce" to Pat’s leadership, what she definitely didn’t understand about, but learned from, a 5-year-old’s soccer game, how to visualize winning in a (very, very) highly detailed way, the key component that gets you to over a 90% success rate, and the answer to the mystery of just who is “Trish”? Mentioned in this episode: This episode is brought to you by Pat Summitt Leadership Group. Pat Summitt Leadership Group…

לפני שנה 3:35

MP3•בית הפרקים

Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; The prior art […]

The post MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

311 פרקים

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

44 subscribers

published לפני שנה

שתפו

MP3•בית הפרקים

The post MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? appeared first on Patent Education Series.

311 פרקים

#Questions And Answers #Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Lisa Parmley #USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006 #Law #News #Politics #Business #Business Disciplines #Podcasting Education

Wszystkie odcinki

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. 2:53

לפני יומיים2:53

2:53

Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […] The post MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. 3:01

לפני 16 ימים3:01

3:01

Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? 3:19

לפני 4 weeks3:19

3:19

Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and non-claimed, distinct subject matter be […] The post MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? 2:26

לפני 6 weeks2:26

2:26

Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entry will be via […] The post MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? 3:41

לפני 8 weeks3:41

3:41

Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the […] The post MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? 2:22

לפני 10 weeks2:22

2:22

Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] The post MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? 2:11

לפני 12 weeks2:11

2:11

Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee by a credit card, is […] The post MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. 2:39

לפני 14 weeks2:39

2:39

Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? 3:02

לפני 16 weeks3:02

3:02

Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specification and enabled by the original […] The post MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? 3:52

לפני 18 weeks3:52

3:52

Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may become necessary to […] The post MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. 3:11

לפני 20 weeks3:11

3:11

Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” […] The post MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? 3:30

לפני 22 weeks3:30

3:30

Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the […] The post MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. 2:19

לפני 24 weeks2:19

2:19

Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. 3:18

לפני 26 weeks3:18

3:18

Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second petition […] The post MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) 3:23

לפני 28 weeks3:23

3:23

Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […] The post MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) appeared first on Patent Education Series .…

ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!

Player FM סורק את האינטרנט עבור פודקאסטים באיכות גבוהה בשבילכם כדי שתהנו מהם כרגע. זה יישום הפודקאסט הטוב ביותר והוא עובד על אנדרואיד, iPhone ואינטרנט. הירשמו לסנכרון מנויים במכשירים שונים.

תקשיבו ל-500+ נושאים

44 subscribers

דומה לPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Amazon Basics Multipurpose Copy Printer Paper, 8.5 x 11 inches, 20 lb, 1 Ream, 500 Sheets, 92 Bright, White

Tubi: Watch Free Movies & TV Shows

Minecraft

פודקאסטים ששווה להאזין

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast « » MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?

MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?

פודקאסטים ששווה להאזין

ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!

Mighty Patch™ Original patch from Hero Cosmetics - Hydrocolloid Acne Pimple Patch for Covering Zits and Blemishes in Face and Skin, Vegan-friendly and Not Tested on Animals (36 Count)

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

Amazon Fire TV Stick HD (newest model), free and live TV, Alexa Voice Remote, smart home controls, HD streaming

Amazon Basics Multipurpose Copy Printer Paper, 8.5" x 11", 20 lb, 8 Reams, 4000 Sheets, 92 Bright, White

The Let Them Theory: A Life-Changing Tool That Millions of People Can't Stop Talking About

דומה לPatent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

מדריך עזר מהיר

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast « »
MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?