Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
503 subscribers
Checked 27d ago
הוסף לפני nine שנים
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - אפליקציית פודקאסט
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !
Barnes v. Felix
Manage episode 462797959 series 123810
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
A case in which the Court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.
…
continue reading
522 פרקים
Manage episode 462797959 series 123810
תוכן מסופק על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
A case in which the Court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.
…
continue reading
522 פרקים
כל הפרקים
×U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Cunningham v. Cornell University 1:30:44
1:30:44
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:30:44data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether a plaintiff can state a claim under a provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) that bars a plan fiduciary from knowingly engaging in a transaction that is an exchange of goods or services between the plan and anyone barred from doing business with the plan, simply by alleging that such a transaction occurred.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will decide whether courts should apply the “moment of the threat” doctrine when evaluating an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. 1:12:11
1:12:11
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:12:11data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether a manufacturer may file a petition for review in a circuit where it neither resides nor has its principal place of business, if the petition is joined by a seller of the manufacturer’s products that is located within that circuit.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation 1:13:53
1:13:53
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:13:53data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether, under the Hobbs Act, a federal district court is bound by the Federal Communication Commission’s legal interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton 2:05:32
2:05:32
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי2:05:32data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is “harmful to minors” to verify the age of each of its users before providing access should be subject to “rational basis” review or “strict scrutiny.”
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 49:00
49:00
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי49:00data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether a voluntary dismissal without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 is a “final judgment, order, or proceeding” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 1014, which prohibits making a “false statement” for the purpose of influencing certain financial institutions and federal agencies, also prohibits making a statement that is misleading but not false.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will decide whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant whose original sentence was imposed before the Act’s enactment, then vacated and resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the Act’s enactment.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida 1:18:04
1:18:04
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:18:04data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a former employee—who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed—loses her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job.…
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to TikTok, violates the First Amendment.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Dewberry Group, Inc. v. Dewberry Engineers Inc. 1:10:57
1:10:57
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:10:57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether an award of the “defendant’s profits” under the Lanham Act can include an order for the defendant to disgorge the distinct profits of legally separate non-party corporate affiliates.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, Colorado 1:50:36
1:50:36
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:50:36data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Environmental Policy Act requires an agency to study environmental impacts beyond the proximate effects of the action over which the agency has regulatory authority.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
1 Feliciano v. Department of Transportation 1:13:33
1:13:33
הפעל מאוחר יותר
הפעל מאוחר יותר
רשימות
לייק
אהבתי1:13:33data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2ee8/e2ee8cc9432b46cd4630facd70372204c0b5535d" alt="icon"
A case in which the Court will decide whether a federal civilian employee called or ordered to active duty under a provision of law during a national emergency is entitled to differential pay even if the duty is not directly connected to the national emergency.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will consider the scope of property interests and fraud in government contracting, particularly when deception occurs without clear economic harm.
U
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11b5b/11b5b199e414ddae2a12644cd4514ecf65871119" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6154c/6154c1c44624abdfc4db2044cd7c5cf0d5451678" alt="U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast artwork"
A case in which the Court will decide whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.…
ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!
Player FM סורק את האינטרנט עבור פודקאסטים באיכות גבוהה בשבילכם כדי שתהנו מהם כרגע. זה יישום הפודקאסט הטוב ביותר והוא עובד על אנדרואיד, iPhone ואינטרנט. הירשמו לסנכרון מנויים במכשירים שונים.