Artwork

תוכן מסופק על ידי Alena Simpson. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי Alena Simpson או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - אפליקציית פודקאסט
התחל במצב לא מקוון עם האפליקציה Player FM !

#2 Big Data - Pitfalls of Non-Traditional Research Methods

12:36
 
שתפו
 

Manage episode 304235593 series 2992707
תוכן מסופק על ידי Alena Simpson. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי Alena Simpson או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

You've probably heard how big data has changed the world by bringing hyper-customization to the forefront, discovering obscure patterns, and allowing people to react quickly to new information. In this episode Leina discusses the pros and cons of the big data revolution from a scientific standpoint. Here are the pitfalls she wants you to be aware of:

  • Big data analysis finds complex patterns quickly but cannot explain scientific phenomena. Most people are willing to accept subjective explanations to phenomena regardless of whether it is supported by evidence.
  • Research and analyses using big data is shaped around the data that is available, while the underlying causal relationship may not be captured.
  • By emphasizing correlations rather than root-causes we further impede finding effective long-term solutions.
  • "Correlation is not causation" is used selectively to confirm biases or enable cognitive dissonance. It is true, but observing patterns is part of the process of asking questions.
  • Big data is inherently dehumanizing by turning people into numbers.
  • Data fishing, also known as significance chasing, is when one approaches a research problem without a predefined hypothesis.
  • There is an increasing absence of gold standard research methodology that emphasizes the use of sample randomization, placebo groups, and blinding to minimize bias.
  • Big data quality is notoriously poor. Missing data, subjective and inconsistent definitions, and unstandardized methods of collection make the data scientist's job difficult.
  • Qualitative methods are not always taken into consideration to confirm or reject big data findings.
  • Any data can be skewed and omit information altogether.
  • Standardization is likely impossible. It should be emphasized that one should always READ THE FINE PRINT.

Leina is here to remind you that bigger is not always better. Join on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram https://linktr.ee/leinacast

  continue reading

2 פרקים

Artwork
iconשתפו
 
Manage episode 304235593 series 2992707
תוכן מסופק על ידי Alena Simpson. כל תוכן הפודקאסטים כולל פרקים, גרפיקה ותיאורי פודקאסטים מועלים ומסופקים ישירות על ידי Alena Simpson או שותף פלטפורמת הפודקאסט שלהם. אם אתה מאמין שמישהו משתמש ביצירה שלך המוגנת בזכויות יוצרים ללא רשותך, אתה יכול לעקוב אחר התהליך המתואר כאן https://he.player.fm/legal.

You've probably heard how big data has changed the world by bringing hyper-customization to the forefront, discovering obscure patterns, and allowing people to react quickly to new information. In this episode Leina discusses the pros and cons of the big data revolution from a scientific standpoint. Here are the pitfalls she wants you to be aware of:

  • Big data analysis finds complex patterns quickly but cannot explain scientific phenomena. Most people are willing to accept subjective explanations to phenomena regardless of whether it is supported by evidence.
  • Research and analyses using big data is shaped around the data that is available, while the underlying causal relationship may not be captured.
  • By emphasizing correlations rather than root-causes we further impede finding effective long-term solutions.
  • "Correlation is not causation" is used selectively to confirm biases or enable cognitive dissonance. It is true, but observing patterns is part of the process of asking questions.
  • Big data is inherently dehumanizing by turning people into numbers.
  • Data fishing, also known as significance chasing, is when one approaches a research problem without a predefined hypothesis.
  • There is an increasing absence of gold standard research methodology that emphasizes the use of sample randomization, placebo groups, and blinding to minimize bias.
  • Big data quality is notoriously poor. Missing data, subjective and inconsistent definitions, and unstandardized methods of collection make the data scientist's job difficult.
  • Qualitative methods are not always taken into consideration to confirm or reject big data findings.
  • Any data can be skewed and omit information altogether.
  • Standardization is likely impossible. It should be emphasized that one should always READ THE FINE PRINT.

Leina is here to remind you that bigger is not always better. Join on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram https://linktr.ee/leinacast

  continue reading

2 פרקים

כל הפרקים

×
 
Loading …

ברוכים הבאים אל Player FM!

Player FM סורק את האינטרנט עבור פודקאסטים באיכות גבוהה בשבילכם כדי שתהנו מהם כרגע. זה יישום הפודקאסט הטוב ביותר והוא עובד על אנדרואיד, iPhone ואינטרנט. הירשמו לסנכרון מנויים במכשירים שונים.

 

מדריך עזר מהיר

האזן לתוכנית הזו בזמן שאתה חוקר
הפעלה